Valuing Staff Equity and Pricing Capital Raises for Brisbane Companies

Shares and options given to Brisbane staff need one value for the employee's tax and another for the company's accounts, and a priced round leaves the ordinary shares worth less than the investors paid. We set out each figure, and the gap between them, while the terms can still change.

Indicative valuations from A$799. Certified Summary and Detailed reports from seven business days.

When a Brisbane company grants equity to staff, Division 83A needs a market value for the employee's tax and AASB 2 needs a grant-date fair value for the company's accounts. Around a capital raise, the same work splits the round price between share classes, sets the ordinary share value and documents the ESIC evidence.

Two values from every grant, and why they rarely agree

Staff equity in Brisbane turns up well beyond the start-up scene. A software company in Fortitude Valley or Newstead grants options to keep its engineers from moving interstate. An engineering or mining services firm in Milton rewards senior project managers through a loan-funded share plan. A medical technology spin-out near the Herston health precinct issues shares to the researchers whose work it was built on. In every case two tests start on the day the equity changes hands: Division 83A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 measures the employee's discount against market value, and AASB 2 requires the company to expense the fair value of the award as at the grant date. Those are different questions asked on different bases, and they seldom produce the same figure.

Using one number for both creates two separate problems. If the market value is too low, the ATO can amend the employee's assessment and examine whether the company's ESS reporting was accurate. If the fair value is wrong, every profit and loss statement across the vesting period carries the error, and it tends to surface at the first audit or in the due diligence an incoming investor commissions.

A priced round brings all of this to a head. Once a Newstead scale-up closes its Series A, every later grant is measured against the round price, yet the new investors hold preference shares with rights the staff's ordinary shares lack. Pegging the option exercise price to the preference price either overcharges staff for their options or puts at risk the start-up concession the plan relies on, and the mistake stays hidden until an auditor or the ATO asks to see the calculation.

We prepare both values as separate conclusions with the reasoning shown, for founders and boards from the CBD and South Bank out to the established family companies of Acacia Ridge, Eagle Farm and the Australia TradeCoast. If the numbers will not support the position the company hopes to take, we tell you before any grant letter is signed.

Book a Free Consultation

A certified valuer will listen to your situation and answer any questions you may have, at no cost.

Andrew Mackson
Andrew Mackson, CFA, ABV, CBV
Managing Partner · 15+ years
Book a Free Consultation →

What each framework asks, and on which date

Division 83A decides when an employee pays tax on equity and on how much. AASB 2 decides what the company records as an expense and over which periods. A single calculation cannot answer both, and an attempt to make it do so usually leaves at least one of them wrong.

Division 83A: the employee's taxable discount

The amount assessed is the market value of the share or right less anything the employee paid for it. Tax falls in the year of acquisition unless the scheme qualifies for deferral, in which case the taxing point moves to when any real risk of forfeiture and any genuine disposal restriction end, and no later than fifteen years after the grant. Whichever date applies, the company needs a market value it can support for that day.

AASB 2: the expense in the company's accounts

An equity-settled award is measured once, at grant, and that amount is recognised over the vesting period whatever the share price does next. A cash-settled award, such as a phantom share plan, is remeasured at every reporting date until it is settled. Service conditions and non-market performance conditions work through the number of awards expected to vest, and the expense reverses if they are not met. A market condition, a total shareholder return hurdle for example, is built into the grant-date value, so the expense remains even if the hurdle is never reached.

The start-up concession and its two grant-date limits

Subdivision 83A-33 lets an unlisted Australian resident company, incorporated for less than ten years and with aggregated turnover of no more than $50 million, give staff equity without an upfront tax bill. The condition is a pair of limits measured on the grant date: a share discount of no more than 15 per cent of market value, and an option exercise price at or above the market value of the underlying share. Meeting either limit depends on a value that existed at grant, not one assembled afterwards.

ESS reporting and Queensland payroll tax

Each employee's ESS statement is due by 14 July and the ESS annual report must reach the ATO by 14 August, and both rely on market values. Queensland payroll tax raises a separate question: under the Payroll Tax Act 1971 (Qld), administered by the Queensland Revenue Office, shares and options granted to employees are generally treated as wages, valued on the grant date or the vesting date depending on the employer's election. A plan with staged vesting can therefore need a third valuation date for a single award.

A safe harbour settles the method, not the value

A qualifying start-up may use the ATO's safe harbour methods: a net tangible assets calculation for shares, and for options a published table based on share value, exercise price and remaining term. That certainty has real worth. The resulting number, though, can be far from what the equity would fetch, and where the safe harbour is not available or gives an obviously unrealistic answer, market value falls back to general principles: the price a willing and informed buyer and seller would agree at arm's length, with neither compelled to deal.

How we value shares, options and a priced round

We start by valuing the unlisted company as a whole, through the income and market approaches, or from the last arm's length round if it is recent and nothing material has changed since. That value is then shared out across the classes on the register. A liquidation waterfall pays out each preference in turn and fits a company close to an exit. The option pricing method treats each class as a call option over the business, with the preference amounts as strike prices, and a backsolve tunes that model until it reproduces the price the latest investors paid. For a Fortitude Valley software company a few months past its Series A, the backsolve is usually the strongest route to an ordinary share value.

Options and performance rights are then priced with a model that fits their terms. Black-Scholes handles a plain option with a fixed exercise price. A binomial lattice handles early exercise and vesting in tranches. Monte Carlo simulation is required once a market hurdle or another path-dependent feature appears. With no trading history to draw on, volatility is the input an auditor examines first, so we derive it from a documented set of listed peers matched on industry, size and gearing, measured over a period consistent with the award's expected life. A loan-funded share plan, of the kind some Brisbane engineering and mining services firms use for senior staff, is in substance an option because the employee's loan is limited in recourse, and we value it that way whatever the plan calls it.

Around a raise, the same analysis answers what founders actually want to know. What is the headline pre-money valuation worth once the option pool is carved out before the new money arrives, convertible notes and SAFEs convert at their cap or discount, and the preference stack sits ahead of the ordinary shares? What is a single ordinary share worth on the day of the next grant? For the early stage innovation company offset, the company must meet the early stage test and either the 100-point innovation test or the principles-based test when the shares are issued. Your tax adviser decides whether it qualifies; we prepare the market sizing, scalability and competitive advantage evidence the principles-based limbs depend on, dated and kept on file. If a bank is part of the funding, a lender-facing valuation covers enterprise value for sizing the facility, the assets offered as security and the headroom against proposed covenants.

What every award and every raise is checked against

Where share scheme and capital raise valuations fail

None of these shows up when the grant is made. They surface when an auditor, the next investor's advisers or the ATO asks for the calculation, by which point the terms cannot be changed.

Pricing and Report Types: Indicative Valuations From A$799

Almost every share scheme or raise valuation ends up in front of a reader outside the company: the auditor checking the AASB 2 expense, the ATO reviewing the ESS annual report or a start-up concession claim, or the advisers to the next round's investors. That is why a certified report is the normal choice. An Indicative valuation is most useful earlier, while the plan is still being drafted and the terms remain open.

Indicative Valuation
From A$799
Choose this while the plan rules or term sheet are still being drafted and you want a reasoned range for the ordinary shares before the exercise price or round price is fixed. Intended for internal decision-making; it is not a certified opinion for lenders, courts or the ATO.
Delivery: from seven business days after receipt of all information
Up to 50 pages
Internal audience
Can be used in litigation
Capital structure: common equity, bank/shareholder loans
Compliant with ATO market value guidance
APES 225 Valuation Engagement
Certified and signed by an experienced practitioner
Completed and reviewed by well trained staff
Considers and applies, when relevant, all 3 valuation approaches (income, market, asset)
Applies multiple cost of capital estimates (limited to 3)
Executive summary
Statement of limiting conditions
Valuation exhibits
Glossary
Table of contents
Company review
Industry review
Economic review
Discussion of valuation approaches and types of discounts
Discussion of the application of valuation approaches and discounts
Conclusion
Email support
Closing Zoom Call
Detailed Valuation
Contact for Pricing
Choose this where awards carry market hurdles, several preference classes sit on the register, the start-up concession is close to its limits, or a dispute over value is foreseeable. Certified and signed. Applies and reconciles all relevant approaches in full so another expert can follow the reasoning.
Delivery: from seven business days after receipt of all information
150+ pages
Internal and external audience, including for litigation or when likely to be reviewed by others
Can be used in litigation by a broad range of professionals
Capital structure: common equity, bank/shareholder loans
Compliant with ATO market value guidance
APES 225 Valuation Engagement
Certified and signed by an experienced practitioner
Completed and reviewed by well trained staff
Considers and applies, when relevant, all 3 valuation approaches (income, market, asset)
Applies multiple cost of capital estimates (full set of 12)
Executive summary
Statement of limiting conditions
Valuation exhibits
Glossary
Table of contents
Company review (full)
Industry review (full)
Economic review (full)
Discussion of valuation approaches and types of discounts (full)
Discussion of the application of valuation approaches and discounts (full)
Conclusion
Email support
Closing Zoom Call

See the full Services and Pricing page

What the report contains and who stands behind it

The report links every conclusion to its framework, the valuation date that framework requires, the standard of value and the information relied on. It sets out the whole-of-company valuation, how value is allocated across the classes, which model was used for each award and why, every input with its source, and how far the result moves when the key inputs move, usually volatility and expected term. Where the Division 83A and AASB 2 figures differ, the report explains the gap, so your tax adviser and your auditor are reading the same document.

A certified valuer signs every report, answers the auditor's questions directly, defends the peer group and the model choice, and stands behind the conclusion if the ATO or a later investor challenges it. If a disagreement over value reaches the Supreme Court of Queensland, for example between founders or between the company and a departing executive, the same valuer can give expert evidence under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld). We work alongside your tax adviser, the lawyers drafting the plan rules and your auditor from the start, because a valuation prepared without them usually has to be redone.

Ask this before the grant letters are signed

If the auditor challenges the volatility input and the ATO challenges the exercise price, does one working paper answer both? If it does not yet, hold the grant.

Questions Brisbane founders and boards ask about staff equity and raise valuations

Two, in almost every case. Division 83A of the ITAA 1997 taxes the employee on the discount, measured at market value either when the interest is acquired or at a later deferred taxing point. AASB 2 records an expense in the company's accounts based on a fair value fixed at the grant date, which is never updated for later share price movements. Different dates and different bases usually give different numbers. We report both conclusions separately in a single document and explain why they differ, so your tax adviser and your auditor are both covered.
Only as the place to start. Investors in a priced round nearly always subscribe for preference shares carrying liquidation preferences, dividend rights and anti-dilution protection. Those rights are worth something, which makes a preference share more valuable than the ordinary share an employee holds. Using the preference price for ordinary shares overstates the employee's taxable discount and sets option exercise prices higher than the start-up concession requires. The better approach allocates the round price between the classes, usually by calibrating an option pricing model to what the investors paid, and derives the ordinary share value from that.
Both limits in the concession are measured against market value on the grant date: the discount on a share can be no more than 15 per cent, and the exercise price of an option can be no lower than the value of the underlying share. Without a value that can be supported for that day, compliance cannot be shown, and if a breach is found later the capital gain the employee expected becomes ordinary income in the year of grant. A valuation can be prepared after the event as at the grant date, but the exercise price has already been set and cannot be changed retrospectively.
The award's terms decide. Black-Scholes suits a plain option with a fixed exercise price and no early exercise. A binomial lattice suits early exercise or vesting in tranches. A total shareholder return hurdle or another market condition needs Monte Carlo simulation, because the payoff depends on the path the share price takes. Share value less exercise price is only an intrinsic value and will not satisfy an auditor. Whatever the model, each input has to be supported, and for an unlisted company the volatility drawn from listed peers is the assumption challenged first.
Generally, yes. Under the Payroll Tax Act 1971 (Qld), administered by the Queensland Revenue Office, shares and options granted to employees are treated as wages. The employer usually elects whether the value is taken on the grant date or the vesting date, and that value goes into the payroll tax return. The chosen day often matches neither the Division 83A taxing point nor the AASB 2 grant date, so a single award with staged vesting may need values at three dates. Your tax adviser decides the election; we provide the values it depends on.
By creating the evidence at the time, while it is easy to gather. The offset requires the company to pass the early stage test and either the 100-point innovation test or the principles-based test when the shares are issued. The principles-based test asks for evidence of high growth potential, scalability, a market wider than the local one and a competitive advantage, and companies fail it on review more often for lack of documentation than for lack of substance. We prepare sourced market sizing, unit economics and competitive analysis so the file is in place before an investor claims the offset. Whether the company qualifies is for your tax adviser to decide.
Certified reports are delivered from seven business days after we have the information we need. For a share scheme that means the plan rules and proposed grant terms, a capitalisation table showing each class and its rights, recent financial statements and management accounts, any forecasts, and the documents from the most recent round. If grants are being timed around a raise, involving us before the round closes means the valuation can inform the terms rather than simply record them. An Indicative valuation for planning uses the same analysis and is intended for internal decision-making only.
Indicative valuations start from A$799 and are intended for internal decision-making, so they suit an owner who wants a well-reasoned range before committing to anything. Summary and Detailed reports are certified and are quoted after a free consultation, because the fee depends on the purpose, the number of entities, the state of the records and whether the opinion must withstand review by a court, the ATO or another expert. The fee is confirmed in the engagement letter before work starts, and every report is delivered from seven business days after we receive the information.

Book a Free Consultation

Talk your situation through with a certified valuer before you commit to anything, at no cost.

Andrew Mackson
Andrew Mackson, CFA, ABV, CBV
Managing Partner · 15+ years
Book a Free Consultation →

Related pages

Certified Valuation Reports From Seven Business Days

Every report is signed by a credentialed certified valuer and built to withstand ATO, ASIC, court and bank scrutiny.

Book a Consultation